I know this may seem a little
left field considering everyone’s opinion of tennis in this day and age, but I
am starting to feel that apart from the top four players the rest of the top 100
stars are just not as good as ones from the past.
One thing I got sick of hearing a
few years ago was that Roger Federer had it easy; he won so many majors and
tournaments because the standard of tennis was poor. What a load of crap (just think so many of the supposed poor players from Roger's era are still
playing and beating the younger guys now, even when they are over 30). The reason Federer was and still is winning is
simple; he is just the greatest, streets ahead of the rest of the field. Then along came another genius in Rafa Nadal
and then another in Djokovic and now finally Andy Murray seems ready to join
their elite level of winning slams.
Also what is very disparaging about Federer's era, the guys around 30 is the way they talk about Andy Roddick, he was and still is a world class player and he will be sadly missed from the tour. Roddick was just extremely unfortunate to come across the greatest player ever. He should have won Wimbledon in 09, and he will always be fondly remembered at SW9.
Also what is very disparaging about Federer's era, the guys around 30 is the way they talk about Andy Roddick, he was and still is a world class player and he will be sadly missed from the tour. Roddick was just extremely unfortunate to come across the greatest player ever. He should have won Wimbledon in 09, and he will always be fondly remembered at SW9.
So now we have the four great players,
and let’s be honest they win everything, 29 of the last 30 majors, every Masters
1000 since November 2010. They are generally the guys who get to the semis and
no one else apart from once in a while can challenge them. Only one person in 8
years of slams and nearly 2 years in Masters Events; does that not seem
strange. The only one that may add his
name to the list would be Juan Martin Del Potro, but he gets injured a lot and
he still has to go through the big four to win a slam and he has never won a Masters
1000 event.
The next thing that sprang to
mind was Tsonga’s attitude to losing and his comments about how it’s nearly
impossible win anything, I think Berdych may have said similar comments. Tsonga’s comments and his attitude seemed to
say to me that he knew to win the US Open this year he would have to beat
Murray in the Quarters, Federer in the Semis, and Djokovic in the Final, and it
felt like he had given up before he even hit a ball.
On top of this apparent apathy which
is clearly starting to affect some of the nearly top players, players who would
have won far more competitions in the past in their opinions I expect, we have
a resurgence of the 30 something’s, coming back into the game. Instead of the past precession of top star,
18 – 26, then fading away gracefully, the top stars are not going away. I think I heard there was a record amount of
30 year olds in Wimbledon and now the US Open.
So what does this say, it certainly
knocks the credibility of the people who say Roger Federer was lucky because many
of the people from his era are still playing a high standard of tennis. And what can we say about the future, as I
watched the Murray Raonic match the commentator said Murray was reaching the
final of the US Open as Raonic’s age, and Milos is supposed to be one of the
next big things in tennis. Djokovic had
won the Aussie Open at Raonic’s age, Rafa won at 18; Del Potro won at 21
also. Who at that age now is going to
beat these guys – no one?
It is sad to say but when finally
Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray hang up their tennis
rackets and retire the guys ready to take their place, don’t exist. There is no one in their class at this time, not
even close; people can rave on about Raonic or any other lanky big server, but
it will be a long time before we see the like of this era of tennis again.
One parting notice on the US
Open, the crowds were really poor in the first week it is as if everyone knows
tennis is about four players, so why turn up when the prices are so high. What is the point of having a massive 23,000 seated
stadium if it’s only got a few thousand people in it. Either make the tickets cheaper for supposed
lesser matches or allow kids in to watch, do something because if anything will turn
off the tennis pro from performing at their best it’s an empty stadium.
No comments:
Post a Comment